Wednesday, September 20, 2006

9/11 DENIAL


INTRODUCTION
We're probably all familiar with the concept of 'Holocaust Denial'. In spite of the overwhelming physical and photographic evidence as well as eyewitness accounts of survivors and their liberators, there are some fringe 'KOOKS' (some of whom are 'academicians') who insist that somehow the Holocaust is a fabrication. In response to such 'KOOKS', most of us tend to shake our heads sadly and write these people off as being only marginally in touch with reality.


Something similar seems to be happening with respect to 9/11. In spite of the fact that the fifth anniversary of 9/11 made this calamitous event 'front and center' in the Mendacious MSM for a few days, rest assured that a week or so later, these same manufacturers of DISINFORMATION will once again start acting like 9/11 never happened.


9/11 CONSPIRACY KOOKS
Robert Kennedy jr. seems to be a wide ranging conspiracy theory kook. In addition to claiming that the 2004 election was 'stolen', he also seems to have some affinity with the 'conspiracy theory' that '9/11 was somehow fabricated by the Bushies'.


Ditto for the publishing arm of the Presbyterian Church (Westminster John Knox Press a division of the Presbyterian Publishing Corp.) and its newly released book by David Griffin entitled "Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11: A Call to Reflection and Action" . It's a 'conspiracy theory' tirade, and essentially 'faith based and fact free'.


    There is also the case of U of Wisconsin professor Barrett, who apparently teaches 'conspiracy theory' as part of his classes. UW officials refuse to reprimand him, let alone fire him.



    Another example of the crippled logic of the LEFTISTS and MSM goes something like this:



      'There have been no Terrorist attacks in the US for the five years since 9/11, therefore 9/11 and the WAR ON TERROR are not for real as far as America is concerned.'



    These kinds of arguments and others like them have been roundly refuted in a fairly lengthy piece published in Popular Mechanics Magazine in 2005 and later released as a book entitled "9/11: Debunking The Myths". As sources go, Popular Mechanics seems hardly as politicized as some others weighing in on this subject.



    Then there is Oliver Stone's 9/11 movie "World Trade Center". It is regarded by some as a good cinematic piece of work, with its focus on the tribulations of two firemen buried in the rubble, who were ultimately rescued and survived. There's no 'conspiracy' theme here, as in Stone's JFK Assassination film. However, in the whole movie there's practically no hint that this disaster was perpetrated by Islamic Radicals. It's almost as if the twin towers had been felled by bolts of lightning from the heavens... a 'natural' disaster as opposed to MASS MURDER at the hands of Islamic TERRORISTS.


    This is yet another if more subtle variety of 9/11 denial.


    In contrast to this, the earlier movie "United 93", and the ABC 6 hour series "The Path to 9/11", make no bones about who was responsible. No 9/11 denial here.



    If 9/11 could somehow be made to 'disappear' or made to take on the aura of a 'hoax', then this 'T-REX in the room' (i.e. would there have been war in Afghanistan or Iraq without 9/11) would also go away and the world would somehow return to what it was on 9/10. What's more, if 9/11 'didn't exist', then similar claims could be made regarding the WAR on TERROR, and eventually there would be nothing for EXTREME LEFTISTS and DEMS to be 'weak on'. That's why the EXTREME LEFTISTS (a sizeable proportion of the DEMS) and the MSM and Pundit Pukes are working 24/7 to promote 9/11 denial.


    LET's PLAY WHAT IF
    Suppose there actually had been no 9/11. Let's engage in a 'mental exercise'. What might the world be like if we had not been provoked into LIBERATING Afghanistan and Iraq?

    o We would have WMD threats from North Korea, Iran, Iraq, and Lybia.


      o Afghanistan, Iraq, the Palestinians, and Lebanon would still not have even a 'first approximation' to Democracy. All four would continue to be safe havens for al Qaeda or other TERRORISTS.


      o Some of these TERRORISTS would most assuredly have succeeded in striking the USA on a date other than 9/11 rather than being preoccupied with 'Driving the Americans out of Afghanistan or Iraq'.


      Keep in mind that the original 9/11 plan was to do the deed on Klinton's watch, but the plan's ten different airplanes with ten different targets was regarded by Bin Laden as being 'too ambitious' and too 'prone to error' so the plot was delayed and the number of airplanes was scaled back to 4. The point here is that Bin Laden could not have cared less whether he attacked under a DEM or GOP presidency... after all, he'd already struck vis-a-vis Khobar Towers, East Africa, and the USS Cole, all under the Klintonistas, no matter how much they 'sucked up' to ISLAMIC TERRORISTS .


      Also keep in mind that in addition to the DEM legacy of 'The State Department's and Madeline HALF-bright's foreign policy', there was also the legacy of legal impediments to information flow arising from 'treating TERRORISM as a CRIME', along with bad intelligence due to the evisceration of any 'on the ground INTEL' by the Church committee and other DEMS. All of this would have made us just as vulnerable on any subsequent or previous dates as we were on 9/11. Only the 3000 innocent civilian MURDERS of 9/11 could even begin to change this CULTURE of APPEASEMENT, LAX SECURITY and DENIAL.


      o The Taliban would still be beheading or stoning people in soccer stadiums for failing to adhere to the letter of Sharia as interpreted by the Taliban's self-appointed keepers of the word of the Koran. Bad things would happen to women if they did not wear burkhas.


      o Saddam would continue brutalizing and murdering his own citizens (including children).


      o France, Russia, and the UN bureaucrats would still be getting rich via the 'Oil for Food SCAM' in collusion with Saddam and Iraq. Not only that, but this same corruption would most likely have led to the eventual lifting of sanctions on IRAQ and Saddam's
      subsequent unmolested and unseen resumption of full scale WMD development.



    Such development may have even been going on under 'so called' UN scrutiny. It's said that Russian Spetznaz cadres helped Saddam move his most 'visible' WMD evidence to Syria shortly before the LIBERATION of Iraq.



    Other bits and pieces with WMD potential (especially the 'compact' chemical and biological ones such as Anthrax and Sarin) may still be in Iraq since massive lethal doses need be no larger than suitcase sized and thus easy to disperse and hide, especially since Iraq is about the same size as Texas and no more than a fraction of 1% of potential hiding places have even been searched.



    BRITISH SKYJACK PLOT
    A month or so ago, the Brits discovered and stopped a plot to hijack and destroy US bound airliners. This discovery came about because the Brits used surveillance and interrogation techniques that the DEMS and the MSM and Pundit Pukes in the US are trying mightily to outlaw and eliminate.


    Had the plot originated in the US and the DEMS had succeeded in imposing on the rest of us, their current retrograde (to pre 9/11) penchant of treating TERRORISM as a 'criminal activity' and giving preference for 'privacy' over SECURITY, those ten airplanes may very well have been destroyed.



    Prior to this, a TERRORIST plot was nipped in the bud in Canada.



    TERRORISM today is a 'clear and present danger' internationally as well as in the US. 9/11 denial won't make this grisly fact go away.


    TERRORISM AS A CRIME
    Just when it seemed that the 'British Plot' conclusively demonstrated that preventing TERRORISM was not the same thing as waiting for it to happen and then prosecuting it as a normal crime, we seem to have a case of Congress pretending neither this nor 9/11 happened, and wanting to go back to 9/10.




    END OF THE PLAME GAME
    After Armitage's belated (after several years) 'confession' of being 'the leaker', one would think that this farce would finally be over. Apparently it is except for Libby who's still under a cloud for apparently having a faulty memory regarding a 'non-crime'.

    * THE LAST WORD ON THE PLAME GAME
    PART (1 of 1)


    At the end of the day, it would seem that the real LIARS were not the Bushies, but Wilson, Plame (aka Mrs. Wilson), Armitage, Fitzgerald, the DEMS, and the MSM and Pundit Pukes. This is not exactly an isolated incident. There have been countless other cases involving the DEMS and their MSM lapdogs, ranging from the recent 'Fauxtography' incident in Lebanon to the Isikoff fabrication involving 'the flushed Koran' to the CBS 60 Minutes and/or Dan Rather 'forged air national guard documents'. All these cases and others were not just instances of slanted reporting but rather, the manufacturing of DISINFORMATION.



    There is a legal conundrum in Latin which goes something like this (I'm paraphrasing):



      'Falsis in unum, falsis in omnibus.'



    It means roughly that if you lie about one thing then you'll probably lie about everything. The DEMS and MSM and Pundit Pukes have LIED about more than just one thing. As a result, unless you're one of them and are living in a 'faith based and fact free bubble' regarding their DOGMA, you'd be well advised to get a second and third opinion on each and every one of their pronouncements.


    Such advice would be especially applicable in the case of 9/11 DENIAL.


    LEFTIST ANTI-SEMITISM and BIGOTRY
    If Holocaust deniers are basically bigots and anti-semites, does something similar apply to 9/11 deniers? Could be. If you're one of today's new breed of LEFTISTS (and many DEMS are) then it's apparently not only OK to deny 9/11 but it's also OK to hate JEWS if they're Neocons and to hate BLACKS if they're Conservatives or Republicans. Don't believe it? What about DEMS like Boxer trashing people like Condi Rice and Justice Clarence Thomas? What about 'Red' Ned Lamont and his out of state zealots from Moveon.org trashing Sen. Lieberman?



    Apparently academicians are also allowed to do this.



    But if this is OK, then where does it stop? The 'Socialist Workers Party' is currently a moniker and front for Trotskyites in the US. Add the word National to this moniker (as in the National Socialist Workers Party) and you get NAZI (Nazional Zocilaistische Arbeits Partei). Plop that little swastika in a white circle doohicky in the middle of the ever popular RED banner of FAR LEFTISTS, and again you get NAZI. NAZIS were and are just another variety of RADICAL LEFTISTS. In the 1920's and 30's many NAZIS started life as Communists or FAR LEFT Socialists and trade unionists. Ditto for Mussolini and Italy's Fascists.


    Then there are also the seeming disconnects and paradoxes. Pat Robertson currently seems to be a bigger supporter of ISRAEL than Russ Feingold. Vladimir Illyich Ulianov once identified a fairly large group of people whom he labeled 'useful idiots'. Not being Lenin, we find nothing particularly useful about them.


    In a similar vein, Lenin also said that the capitalists in their rush to make a profit, would sell the rope that would ultimately be used to hang them.


    People like Feingold and Boxer and Schumer etc. in an effort to 'stick it to' the Bushies, may well be doing something similar with their apparent support of anti-semites from the FAR LEFT or from the more obvious quarters of IslamoFascism such as Iran and 'Adolf' Ahmedinejad .


    So it goes.


    THE PEOPLE SHALL JUDGE


      posted by showme | 11:21 AM

      0 Comments:

      Post a Comment

      << Home