Monday, June 13, 2005

PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO PROVE A NEGATIVE

During the week beginning June 6, 2005, the MSM (Main Stream Media) reported that during an anti-insurgent sweep in the neighborhood of Baghdad, US Marines discovered an underground insurgent complex the size of several football fields. This complex housed all sorts of weapons as well as fairly comfortable 'barrack accommodations' for the insurgents. It was believed that there could very well be an entire network of similar facilities built by Saddam.


This news was treated in a pretty much 'ho-hum' fashion by the MSM maggots. There was certainly no indication on their part that this finding was of any major importance. This was odd considering that this development was screaming implications like a banshee.


The US and the Coalition have been in Iraq for over two years. What's more, the 'seekers' of WMD's (SEE: Kay et al) have long ago given up their search for WMD's, after having declared that:



    "There are absolutely NO WMD's in Iraq!"


Presumably this METAPHYSICAL CERTITUDE in 'having proved a NEGATIVE' (a logically questionable proposition) comes after they supposedly searched everything thoroughly and 'left no stone unturned'.


If that's really the case, then how did they end up missing a facility the size of 'several football fields'?? Granted that only 'conventional weapons' were found there, but surely someone looking for WMD's should have come across something like this during their search.


This is especially disturbing since suitcases containing anthrax or sarin or smallpox or a dirty nuclear device (all of them enough to KILL A LOT OF PEOPLE) are considerably smaller than 'several football fields'.


Is it possible that these 'WMD seekers' couldn't find 'their own A$$ with BOTH hands', let alone WMD's , assuming they were even inclined to really look for either? Is it also possible that Saddam in all his egomaniacal blindness and the errors that usually follow from such hubris, managed nevertheless to outsmart the 'WMD seekers'?


Given these events, assurances made by the 'seekers' as well as the DEMS and other 'LEFTIST IDEOLOGUES' and their 'camp followers consisting of MSM MENDICANT MEGAPHONES and PUNDIT PUKES, that:


    "WMD's are the only reason we invaded Iraq, and WMD's absolutely never existed, don't exist today, and won't exist tomorrow, anywhere in Iraq, and therefore we should never have gone there and liberated the Iraqis from Saddam's tyranny and tried to introduce Democracy there."



have all the credibility and moral authority of a 'wet F**t'.

posted by showme | 1:15 PM

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home