HOW DUMB IS DUMB?

It seems that there is an infinite variety of stupidities in the news today, and that they either 'speak for themselves' or are spun by the MSM (Main Stream Media) to appear to be something else. Those who fall for this spin are also contributors to the torrent of stupidity.

KERRY's GRADES
Here's a good reason why in Campaign 2004, Kerry was reluctant to release his COMPLETE military records. Apparently, among the info in these records, the following was in evidence:

"Newly released Navy records of Sen. John Kerry show the 2004 Democratic presidential candidate, who was portrayed as the intellectual superior of President Bush, actually received a lower academic average than his rival while studying at Yale, including five Ds. Kerry had a cumulative average of 76 (Bush had 77... our insert) and got four Ds his freshman year -- in geology, two history courses and political science."

.... The Boston Globe

One would have thought that Kerry, the 'Frenchurian Candidate' would at least have ACED French... but NOooo, he only got a 'C' in that course.

* BEGINNINGS (SEE: 'Kerry The Frenchurian Candidate?')
PART (1 of 1)

It's interesting to note that the modal occupational choice of MENSA members is 'Truck Driver'. Nobody that smart would be dumb enough to get into politics. It's also entirely possible that Kerry was so 'nuanced' (or was that STUPID??) that he had the short term memory and attention span of a SEA URCHIN, which might largely account for his apparent 'flip-flopping'!!

* KERRY IS NOT A 'FLIP-FLOPPER' (10-12-04)
PART (1 of 1)

This REALITY was of course spun into something entirely different by the MSM, and the PUNDIT PUKES.

* CAMPAIGN 2004 ISSUES
PART (1 of 1)

THE MICHAEL JACKSON VERDICT
Take a close look at pictures of this man and try to figure out how he could be 'not guilty'. Would you be willing to leave him alone with your kid??

Yet that is exactly what a 'jury of his peers' has declared. How 'smart' or 'fair' were these people?

Apparently they were swayed by the possibility that some of the alleged victims, and/or their parents were less than 'sympathetic' or 'pure of heart' or might have appeared to be 'gold diggers' or 'confused and inconsistent'. However, was this true for each and every one of the 10 counts on which Jackson was indicted? It's possible to return guilty verdicts on some of the counts but not others. It's even possible that some of the parents might have engaged in activities that amounted to 'pimping' for their kids.

So what?? How does that make Jackson innocent? People who get caught engaging in 'lewd acts' in bordellos, and might even have ended up there as a result of some 'pimping', are STILL GUILTY!!

Of course, this kind of verdict, largely attributable to clever 'jury shopping', is not exactly unprecedented (SEE: Robert Blake; Kobe Bryant; Bill Clinton [his impeachment 'jury' was the partisan DEMS in the Senate]; and of course O.J. Simpson). 'Jury Shopping' is just another example of the Rule of Law being bent out of shape and otherwise FUBARed by LAWYERS and JUDGES.

The MSM Maggots spin this as 'The triumph of Justice', and the hottest topic on today's morning TV shows is how soon Michael Jackson will be making a comeback in the world of entertainment. However, the AMERICAN PEOPLE are not as 'dumbed down' as some juries. They see this kind of stuff as well as other similar outrages, as a sign that something has gone wrong with our system of JUSTICE as well as our MEDIA and POP CULTURE.

* MEDIA BIAS AND FREEDOM OF SPEECH ISSUES
PART (1 of 1)

* LEGAL ISSUES
PART (1 of 1)

ADDENDUM... GITMO (06-16-05)
All the previous acts of the 'DUMB and DUMBER Idiocracy' mentioned in this post, at least don't have the direct stench of TREASON about them. However, this is what it really comes down to when various LEFTIST POLITICIANS and their MSM MENDICANT LAPDOGS and their PUNDIT PUKE camp followers start calling for a release of the TERRORISTS in residence at 'CLUB GITMO'. Where would we send these people?

To an average MIDDLE EASTERN HOTEL with more primitive accomodations? Perhaps we should let them loose to KILL MORE INNOCENTS because the US LEGALISTAS think this would be a 'good thing'??

Perhaps all of these assorted ANAL SPHINCTERS of the LEFT should consider what we did with NAZI combatants that were not attired in their proper uniforms (SEE: Battle of the Bulge in WW II... many English speaking NAZI combatants infiltrated the Allied ranks and posed as GI's). After extensive (and NOT necessarily 'torture free') interrogations, we simply shot them.

The same happened to other NAZI combatants engaged in armed combat but wearing civilian clothes in Europe. Ditto for those caught operating similarly within the USA. As for what happened in France, just ask the French Resistance (mostly COMMUNISTS) enforcers after the USA (not De Gaulle) LIBERATED France. They even shot uniformed German POW's with little hesitation.

Then there's also the issue of Roosevelt roudning up all NISEI (Japanese Americans), and putting them into INTERNMENT CAMPS until the end of WW II (what if it had lasted longer than 5 years???... How long would he/we have held them??).

Yet here we have the same array of LEFTIST POLITICIANS and their MSM MENDICANT LAPDOGS and their PUNDIT PUKE camp followers, insisting that we treat TERRORISTS the same way as common US criminals... i.e. 'let's afford them the legal privileges of US citizens, and let's let the TRIAL LAWYERS MAKE A FEW BUCKS' (BTW, the normal interrogation techniques depicted in TV shows like NYPD BLUE and LAW and ORDER and other TV 'crime shows' on 'US citizens', would undoubtedly be regarded by these same ANAL SPHINCTERS as extreme TORTURE).

Ironically, GITMO may be the only place where US Government policy allows the ownership and reading of HOLY SCRIPTURES (in this case the KORAN), while the leather winged demons of the ACLU would immediately descend on any other instance of this kind of 'separation of Church and State APOSTASY'. God forbid if in similar circumstances, Christians were supplied by the US Government with Bibles.

These same PUKES paint GITMO as the actual and moral equivalent of SOVIET GULAGS. Where were they when the REAL GULAGS were in 'full bloom' (in fact, under Putin's Authoritarian Fascist Power Grab, there may still be some of them TODAY in Russia).

Where are and/or were these PUKES when places like Cuba and North Vietnam and Rawanda and Darfur and Zimbabwe and Iraq (under Saddam before we LIBERATED it) and Iran and Syria and Lebanon (under Syria) and The Congolese Republic and Liberia and Bosnia/Kosovo (under Milosevic) and Khazakstan and Burma (Mynamar?) and Venezuela and Vietnam and Beylorussia and China and who knows how many other 'Totalitarian Prison States' were doing the REAL THING with respect to 'imprisonment and torture'????

CONCLUSIONS
The AMERICAN PEOPLE are no longer content to just accept this kind of drivel uncritically. They have the power to VOTE at the ballot box, the cash register, and with their TV remote control. Choices are available in ALL of these venues, and fortunately for ALL of us,

THE PEOPLE SHALL JUDGE

PROBLEMS WITH TRYING TO PROVE A NEGATIVE

During the week beginning June 6, 2005, the MSM (Main Stream Media) reported that during an anti-insurgent sweep in the neighborhood of Baghdad, US Marines discovered an underground insurgent complex the size of several football fields. This complex housed all sorts of weapons as well as fairly comfortable 'barrack accommodations' for the insurgents. It was believed that there could very well be an entire network of similar facilities built by Saddam.

This news was treated in a pretty much 'ho-hum' fashion by the MSM maggots. There was certainly no indication on their part that this finding was of any major importance. This was odd considering that this development was screaming implications like a banshee.

The US and the Coalition have been in Iraq for over two years. What's more, the 'seekers' of WMD's (SEE: Kay et al) have long ago given up their search for WMD's, after having declared that:

"There are absolutely NO WMD's in Iraq!"

Presumably this METAPHYSICAL CERTITUDE in 'having proved a NEGATIVE' (a logically questionable proposition) comes after they supposedly searched everything thoroughly and 'left no stone unturned'.

If that's really the case, then how did they end up missing a facility the size of 'several football fields'?? Granted that only 'conventional weapons' were found there, but surely someone looking for WMD's should have come across something like this during their search.

This is especially disturbing since suitcases containing anthrax or sarin or smallpox or a dirty nuclear device (all of them enough to KILL A LOT OF PEOPLE) are considerably smaller than 'several football fields'.

Is it possible that these 'WMD seekers' couldn't find 'their own A$$ with BOTH hands', let alone WMD's , assuming they were even inclined to really look for either? Is it also possible that Saddam in all his egomaniacal blindness and the errors that usually follow from such hubris, managed nevertheless to outsmart the 'WMD seekers'?

* WHAT IF WE FIND NO WMD IN IRAQ? (05-13-03)
PART (1 of 1)

* UPDATE ON WMD IN IRAQ (01-29-04)
PART (1 of 1)

* MORE ON IRAQI WMD (02-08-04)
PART (1 of 1)

* WHAT's REALLY a WMD? (04-01-04)
PART (1 of 1)

* ABSENCE of HARD INFO on IRAQ, WMD, 9/11 (05-27-04)
PART (1 of 1)

* LACK of OVERSIGHT and FORESIGHT on 9/11 and IRAQI WMD (07-13-04)
PART (1 of 1)

Given these events, assurances made by the 'seekers' as well as the DEMS and other 'LEFTIST IDEOLOGUES' and their 'camp followers consisting of MSM MENDICANT MEGAPHONES and PUNDIT PUKES, that:

"WMD's are the only reason we invaded Iraq, and WMD's absolutely never existed, don't exist today, and won't exist tomorrow, anywhere in Iraq, and therefore we should never have gone there and liberated the Iraqis from Saddam's tyranny and tried to introduce Democracy there."

have all the credibility and moral authority of a 'wet F**t'.